Grading rubrics
Below are grading rubrics for some courses.
Introduction to Voice Technology
Wiki pages
The Wiki pages will be assessed according to the criteria below. A total score will be given assigned as an average.
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Topic | 10 |
| Presentation | 10 |
| Underlying research | 10 |
| Content | 10 |
| Internal linking | 10 |
| LLM review | 10 |
Topic: Appropriateness and relevance
- 0 = Inappropriate
- 5 = Somewhat Appropriate
- 7 = Good
- 10 = Completely Appropriate
Presentation: Adherence to layout, clarity of language
- 0 = Unacceptable
- 5 = Sufficient but rushed (lots of language may be difficult to understand or the flow may be incoherent)
- 7 = Good
- 10 = Excellent
Underlying Research: Evidence of scholarly research
- 0 = No citations
- 5 = Citations only to popular content and/or citations are incorrect / missing
- 7 = Some Citations, mainly reporting outcomes
- 10 = Excellent, evidence of synthesis of complex ideas and reflection
Content
- 0 = Incoherent
- 5 = Coherent but superficial
- 7 = Good, some depth
- 10 = Excellent
Internal linking to other Wiki articles produced by peers
- 0 = No Links
- 5 = Some links missing
- 7 = Well-linked to other articles
- 10 = Well-linked to other articles in an enriching way which demonstrates a deep understanding
LLM Review
- 0 = No effort made
- 5 = Minimal effort, but not transparent, insufficient detail
- 7 = LLM used productively and reported well
- 10 = LLM used in a highly productive or interesting way and reported very well
Participation activities
For the most part, participation activities are scored on a three-point scale:
- 0 = incomplete
- 1 = minimal attempt to deliver
- 2 = rushed or incomplete delivery
- 3 = complete delivery
Some activities are worth 2 points:
- 0 = incomplete
- 1 = minimal or incomplete delivery
- 2 = complete delivery