Editing Grading rubrics (section)

=== Wiki pages ===
The Wiki pages will be assessed according to the criteria below. A total score will be given assigned as an average. 
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Criteria
!Points
|-
|Topic
|10
|-
|Presentation
|10
|-
|Underlying research
|10
|-
|Content
|10
|-
|Internal linking
|10
|-
|LLM review
|10
|}
'''Topic''': Appropriateness and relevance

* 0 = Inappropriate
* 5 = Somewhat Appropriate
* 7 = Good
* 10 = Completely Appropriate

'''Presentation''': Adherence to layout, clarity of language

* 0 = Unacceptable
* 5 = Sufficient but rushed (lots of language may be difficult to understand or the flow may be incoherent)
* 7 = Good
* 10 = Excellent

'''Underlying Research''': Evidence of scholarly research

* 0 = No citations
* 5 = Citations only to popular content and/or citations are incorrect / missing
* 7 = Some Citations, mainly reporting outcomes
* 10 = Excellent, evidence of synthesis of complex ideas and reflection

'''Content'''

* 0 = Incoherent
* 5 = Coherent but superficial
* 7 = Good,  some depth
* 10 = Excellent

'''Internal linking''' to other Wiki articles produced by peers

* 0 = No Links
* 5 = Some links missing
* 7 = Well-linked to other articles
* 10 = Well-linked to other articles in an enriching way which demonstrates a deep understanding

'''LLM Review'''

* 0 = No effort made
* 5 = Minimal effort, but not transparent, insufficient detail
* 7 = LLM used productively and reported well
* 10 = LLM used in a highly productive or interesting way and reported very well