Editing
Commercial TTS - Google, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft (2010s)
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== LLM Review == [https://chat.openai.com/share/20d2f685-02ad-4d6d-a36a-969b1eaff13f Reviewed by GPT-4]: <blockquote>Your text provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution and contributions of major tech companies in the field of text-to-speech (TTS). As a professor of speech science reviewing this piece, I'd offer the following feedback: '''Score:''' 90/100 '''Strengths:''' 1. Organization and Structure: Your text has a clear and logical structure, beginning with a broad overview and then diving into company-specific histories and innovations. 2. Comprehensive Detail: You provide a broad range of historical and technological details that showcase deep research and understanding. 3. Citations: The use of references enhances the credibility of your information. 4. Analysis: The "Impact" section critically evaluates the contributions and implications of TTS advancements '''Areas for Improvement:''' 1. Redundancy: There are some instances of repeated information, particularly regarding the historical context of each company's TTS efforts. For example, the mention of Dr. Xuedong Huang's contributions and Microsoft's efforts is repeated in the "Introduction" and "Historical Context" sections. 2. Flow and Transition: Some sections could benefit from smoother transitions to maintain reader engagement and ensure the narrative flow remains uninterrupted. 3. Further Elaboration: In the "Future research" section, you may want to include more about the potential ethical concerns related to deepfakes or synthesized voice impersonations. 4. Grammatical Consistency: Ensure that tense remains consistent throughout the document. For instance, the switch from past to present tense in certain parts can be jarring. Overall: This is a well-researched and written piece that effectively captures the evolution of TTS technology among tech giants. By addressing the areas of improvement mentioned above, this text could be even more polished and impactful. Great job!</blockquote>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to MSc Voice Technology are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution (see
MSc Voice Technology:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information