Editing Dragon Dictate (section)

==LLM Review==

We used [[wikipedia:ChatGPT|Chat GPT]] developed by OpenAI to improve contents quaof the contents lity and make up for the shortcomings. Below is how we Csed chatGPT.

# Act as an '''voice technology professor''' and review this website, grade from 1-100 : Content (90/100): The content is highly informative and provides a comprehensive overview of Dragon Dictate, its development, and its impact. It covers various aspects, including its commercialization, improved accuracy, adaptation, and accessibility. 
# Act as an '''English professor''' and find a grammar mistake  I reviewed the page, and I couldn't find any glaring grammar mistakes. However, it's important to note that I can't access external websites directly, so I can't perform a comprehensive review. If you have a specific sentence or paragraph in mind that you'd like me to examine for potential grammar issues, please provide the text here, and I'll be happy to assist you further.

These above answers confirms that our page is informative, comprehensive and well-structured. But there is still room for improvement, for example:

# Act as an '''voice technology professor''' and review the introduction part of this website: The introduction is relatively short and introduces the topic briefly. However, it could be expanded to provide more content about the importance of speech recognition software. According to this review, I made a sentence into introduction part(the last sentence of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR).)
# It suggests that we '''consider our audience''': While you didn't specify the intended audience, it's generally beneficial to consider the level of familiarity your audience has with the topic. If your audience includes non-experts, providing more explanations and simplifying technical terms may be helpful.