Editing
Grading rubrics
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Interactive poster pitch ==== '''#BetterPoster Slide Evaluation (Total: 7 Points)''' # '''Content Quality (3 points)''' #* 0 points: Lacks depth in content; critical information is missing or incorrect. #* 1 point: Contains relevant information but lacks depth or some content may be inaccurate. #* 2 points: Very good content quality which is very accurate but not very interesting (or may have too much jargon) #* 3 points: Excellent content quality which balances attention-grabbing interest and scientific accuracy.. # '''Alignment with #BetterPoster Principles (4 points)''' #* 0 points: Does not follow #BetterPoster principles; lacks a clear main message. #* 1 point: Partially follows #BetterPoster principles with a main message that could be clearer. May lack a functional QR code. #* 2 points: Aligns with #BetterPoster principles but may lack some aspects of design or clarity. #* 3 points: Well aligned with #BetterPoster principles. Easy to read, uncluttered, and effectively communicates the main message. #* 4 points: Exemplary alignment with #BetterPoster principles. Easy to read, uncluttered, particularly aesthetic, and includes functional enhancements and/or creative / interactive elements. '''3-Minute Pitch Evaluation (Total: 8 Points)''' # '''Delivery (3 points)''' #* 0 points: Unclear, rushed, or monotone delivery that fails to engage the audience. #* 1 point: Basic delivery with some clarity, but generally lacking in engagement. #* 2 points: Good delivery with clear articulation and moderate engagement. #* 3 points: Excellent delivery with engaging, clear, and well-paced articulation. # '''Content and Structure (3 points)''' #* 0 points: Lacks a clear structure; content is disorganized and main points are not conveyed. #* 1 point: Some organization with main points somewhat articulated. #* 2 points: Well-organized content with clear main points. #* 3 points: Exceptionally structured pitch with a compelling narrative and clear, insightful main points. # '''Engagement and Response to Questions (2 points)''' #* 0 points: Does not engage the audience and fails to address questions adequately. #* 1 point: Engages the audience with acceptable responses to most questions. #* 2 points: Highly engages the audience and provides thorough, thoughtful responses to all questions.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to MSc Voice Technology are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution (see
MSc Voice Technology:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information