Editing
Thesis Design
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Assignment descriptions ==== * '''Participation''': Active participation is crucial in this course. This includes engaging in class discussions, contributing to group activities, and consistent attendance. Students are expected to demonstrate engagement with course materials and contribute thoughtfully to peer interactions. Participation will be assessed on the quality of contributions rather than quantity. Note that during class you may be requested to upload some evidence of class participation to a dedicated folder. This will be assessed P/F. * '''Peer review 1''': Research question and hypothesis . This assignment requires peer review, where each student will provide constructive feedback on a classmate's submitted RQ and hypothesis, focusing on clarity, relevance, and feasibility. Your score on this assignment is based on the text you submit and the review you produce. See [https://help.feedbackfruits.com/en/articles/2942398-peer-review-student-perspective this FBF resource] for all peer review assignments. * '''Peer review 2''': Building upon the first peer review assignment, students will refine their RQ and hypothesis and add a provisional methodology. This assignment involves a second round of peer review, where students critique each other's proposed methods for research, assessing the appropriateness, clarity, and potential effectiveness. As before, your score on this assignment is based on the text you submit and the review you produce. * '''Peer review 3''': In this comprehensive assignment, students will complete a detailed research proposal, including the refined RQ, hypothesis, methodology, and a brief literature review. The proposal will undergo a rigorous peer review process, where students are expected to provide in-depth, constructive feedback. The focus will be on the overall coherence, scientific rigor, and originality of the proposals. As before, your score on this assignment is based on the text you submit and the review you produce. This deliverable also includes a link to a hypothesis [[Pre-registration on OSF.io|Pre-registering a project with OSF]]. * '''Article resources''': [[Collaborative article resource assignment]] * '''Interactive poster pitch''': I'll organize an event with external colleagues in which you will present your proposal, either individually or in small groups. Details to be determined based on class progress. ** Make a slide in accordance with #BetterPoster ** Add your slides to [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1bzVJ7ky1esEhs7iO5hozrgpeDOzC5eq_u1iUUZ7R5aA/edit?usp=sharing this deck] under the appropriate heading and also submit it to BrightSpace. ** Due date: Wednesday midnight ** On Thursday I'll send to the visitors and invite them to prepare questions/comments. Information on scoring the participation activities can be found in the [[Grading rubrics#Introduction to voice technology|overview of rubrics]].
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to MSc Voice Technology are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution (see
MSc Voice Technology:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information