Editing Introduction of Voice Assistants (section)

== LLM Review ==
Two different [[wikipedia:Large_language_model|Large language models (LLM)]] were employed in reviewing the current article, as a tool to ensure information accessibility, adherence to grammar rules, coherency, and cohesion of information. The tools used to these ends were [https://chat.openai.com/auth/login ChatGPT] and [https://www.grammarly.com/business/learn/enterprise-grade-generative-ai/#:~:text=As%20a%20result%2C%20we%20have,GrammarlyGO%20holds%20user%20privacy%20paramount Grammarly].

=== ChatGPT ===
After completing a comprehensive draft of the information to be included in the sections of this page, with the corresponding sources, the sentences were fed into ChatGPT<ref><nowiki>https://chat.openai.com</nowiki></ref>, using the following prompts:

* Go through the following text and identify any incoherences, repetitive information, or convoluted phrases; make sure the text is objective, with a neutral tone, in line with the style of a Wikipedia article;
* Make it sound more academic;
The output of the second prompt was overly formal and had many aulic and archaic terms. The text was not incorrect, but overall it was often not appropriate.<blockquote>''E.g.''

Original text: “Cortana not only was able to retrieve information from the user’s devices, as Google Now did, but it was also able to use Bing knowledge graph Satori to enhance online searches.”

ChatGPT rewriting: “Cortana not only replicated the information retrieval functionalities of Google Now but also harnessed the Bing knowledge graph Satori to augment internet-based research endeavours.”</blockquote>Also, ChatGPT moved some paragraphs to the beginning or to the end of a section to make the text more organised.

=== Grammarly ===
Grammarly was used both to check for spelling errors and other formal mistakes and to improve the register of the text, prompting the LLM with the query “Make it sound more academic”. The formal errors it detected were not always actual errors; in some cases, the LLM did not correctly detect the subject in the sentence. In these cases, the sentences were rephrased. The “Make it sound more academic” prompt made register changes, substituting common-use words with more academic ones.

It has to be remarked that not every Grammarly rewriting output was included in the final text, since in some cases, aulic words were used too.