Editing
Grading rubrics
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Article presentation ==== '''1.''' '''Content accuracy and comprehensiveness''' '''(40 points)''' * Excellent (40 points): Precise, thorough summary of key findings, methodology, and relevance to research. Speaker demonstrates high degree of familiarity with the text and critical thinking. * Good (30 points): Covers most key points with minor omissions. Speaker demonstrates good degree of familiarity with the text. * Satisfactory (20 points): Basic summary but misses significant details. Speaker demonstrates moderate degree of familiarity with the text. Lack of critical analysis, more of a "book report". * Needs Improvement (0-10 points): Lacks important information, significant inaccuracies. Speaker demonstrates low degree of familiarity with the text. '''2. Presentation skills assessed by instructor (30 points)''' * Excellent (30 points): Clear, well-organized, within time limit, effective communication. Speaker makes the relevance very clear for those unfamiliar with the topic through avoiding jargon and giving examples. Useful visualizations created by the student. * Good (20 points): Mostly clear, minor issues in delivery or time management. Speaker makes the relevance clear for those unfamiliar with the topic through avoiding jargon and giving examples (though there is room for improvement). * Satisfactory (15 points): Understandable but lacks organization or has delivery issues. Speaker makes the relevance moderately clear for those unfamiliar with the topic, though there may be too much jargon or too few examples. * Needs Improvement (0-5 points): Poorly organized, difficult to follow, major issues in delivery '''3. Contribution to the Wiki (30 points)''' * Excellent (30 points): Excellent summary in very clear and accessible language. This Wiki page is a very useful resource for those interested in the article. * Good (15 points): Good summary in clear and accessible language. This Wiki page is a useful resource for those interested in the article. * Satisfactory (10 points): Basic summary, but room for improvement. This Wiki page is a somewhat useful resource for those interested in the article. * Needs Improvement (0-10 points): Inadequate summary. This Wiki page is a not a particularly useful resource for those interested in the article.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to MSc Voice Technology are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution (see
MSc Voice Technology:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information